Challenges of Meritocracy in Iranian Management from the Perspective of Governance Development
Keywords:
Meritocracy, Good Governance, Managerial Challenges, Structural Reforms, Iran’s Management SystemAbstract
Historical experiences indicate that the progress and advancement of any society depend on meritocracy and the appointment of competent individuals and elites in its affairs. Meritocracy, as one of the fundamental principles of governance, plays a crucial role in achieving societal development and excellence. This study aims to analyze the challenges related to the meritocracy of managers in Iran from the perspective of good governance. The research was conducted using a meta-analysis method. In this approach, articles, dissertations, and scientific reports related to the topics of meritocracy and good governance in Iran were collected and analyzed. The challenges of good governance in Iran pertain to obstacles in the implementation of the rule of law, managerial accountability barriers, justice-oriented impediments, and constraints on citizen participation. Some of the meritocracy challenges in Iran include politicization, mismanagement, and an incorrect strategic culture. These obstacles are categorized into two groups: external organizational factors and internal organizational factors. Data analysis revealed that despite the emphasis of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the components of meritocracy and good governance, these concepts have not been practically implemented. This study identifies the challenges related to meritocracy and good governance in Iran and underscores the importance of reforms in the country's managerial and cultural structures. Decision-makers, instead of selecting competent individuals, tend to appoint those who can satisfy all stakeholders and adhere to social and ethnic obligations. This issue reflects the lack of practical realization of meritocracy in Iran’s management system. Ultimately, the study suggests the necessity of serious reforms in the managerial and cultural structures of the country to achieve meritocracy and good governance in the Iranian management system.
Downloads
References
Alfianto, R., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., & Asal Wahyuni Erlin Mulyadi Asal Wahyuni Erlin, M. (2023). Non-Meritrocratic Factors Affecting Filling of
Positions in Structural Institutions. Journal of Social Science (Joss), 2(7), 578-586. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v2i7.88
Andersen, D. (2018). Does Meritocracy Lead to Bureaucratic Quality? Revisiting the Experience of Prussia and Imperial and Weimar
Germany. Social Science History, 42(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2017.48
Anwar, R., Luddin, M. R., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Appointment of Leader Position: Study on the Regional Government of West Nusa Tenggara.
Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.11594/10.11594/ijssr.02.02.08
Azadi, P., Mesgaran, M. B., & Mirramezani, M. (2022). Governance. 5-57. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503630468.003.0002
Baroun, A. E. (2021). Meritocracy, Personality Traits and Recruitment: Some Insights From the Qatari Enterprising Community. Journal of
Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(3), 494-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-12-2020-0216
Batruch, A., Jetten, J., Herman, G. v. d. W., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2021). Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and
Income Inequality (In Press). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8rzd9
Bell, D. A. (2016). Three Models of Democratic Meritocracy. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691173047.003.0005
Bing, W. (2021). Political Meritocracy and Policy Integration: How Chinese Government Combats the COVID‐19? Asian Politics & Policy,
13(3), 426-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12595
Choon-Yin, S. (2017). Governance, Meritocracy, and Growth Centricity. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813225831_0001
Chua, C. S. K., Soo, L. M. J., & Raza, K. (2024). Work-Integrated (Adult) Learning: Un-Stigmatizing Blue-Collar Adult Learners in Singapore by
Embracing Visibility. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 30(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241228847
Divina, L. V. (2024). Upholding the Strategy on Hiring Employee Under Meritocracy Procedure Towards a Refined Performance.
International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(02), 5821-5830. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.em01
Everest-Philipps, M. (2016). Meritocracy and Public Service Excellence. Review of Civil Servive(1). https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.9
Han, E. J., & Kim, J.-K. (2024). The Relationship Between High School Students’ Meritocracy Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action:
Focusing on the Mediation Effect of System Justification Beliefs and Social Dominance Orientation. Kor MHB Analysis Assoc, 7(1), 51-
72. https://doi.org/10.70316/kmba.2023.7.1.51
Hoyt, C. L., Burnette, J. L., Forsyth, R. B., Parry, M., & DeShields, B. H. (2021). Believing in the American Dream Sustains Negative Attitudes
Toward Those in Poverty. Social psychology quarterly, 84(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725211022319
Jin, J., & Ball, S. J. (2019). Meritocracy, Social Mobility and a New Form of Class Domination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(1),
64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1665496
Kim, S. (2022). Service, Reciprocity, and Remedy: From Confucian Meritocracy to Confucian Democracy. European Journal of Political
Theory, 23(2), 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221127689
Komissarov, A. G. (2022). Meritocratic Principles of Governmental Officials Selection: Historical Aspect and Modern Applications. Voprosy
Ekonomiki(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-45-58
Lee, H. (2023). The Role of Civic Education to Overcome the Limitations of Meritocracy. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum
and Instruction, 23(9), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.9.607
Lee, J. (2024). Four Difficulties in Meritocracy: an Educational Perspective. Korean Educational Research Association, 62(6), 127-155.
https://doi.org/10.30916/kera.62.6.127
Lotfalipour, M. R., Falahi, M. A., Zareei, A., & Matuszczak, A. (2022). How Good Governance (GG) Affects Diaspora Motivations for
Remittances to Iran. Diaspora Studies, 15(4), 329-355. https://doi.org/10.1163/09763457-tat00003
Mang, F. (2020). Political Meritocracy and Its Betrayal. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(9), 1113-1126.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948386
Nabi, G., Shah, N. H., & Ghazanfar, F. (2020). An Analytical Study of Policy, Politics and Bureaucracy Regarding Meritocracy in the Selection
of Head for the Federal Government Institutions. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (Rjsser), 1(4), 401-410.
https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss4-2020(401-410)
Pagano, M., & Picariello, L. (2024). Corporate Governance, Meritocracy, and Careers. Review of Finance.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfae042
Sabani, A., Aulia, N., P, N. M., & M, S. N. (2024). Pentingnya Implementasi Sistem Meritokrasi Dalam Instansi Pemerintahan Indonesia.
Aktivisme, 1(3), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v1i3.333
Sudrajat, T., Kunarti, S., & Hartini, S. (2018). Promotion Policy of Civil Servant Based on Meritrocracy Principle in Local Government of
Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.36
Tory, T. F., & Hanum, R. A. (2024). Nepotisme Dan Korupsi Di Pemerintahan Dalam Perspektif Etika. Jmbe-Itb, 3(1), 126-135.
https://doi.org/10.54066/jmbe-itb.v3i1.2726
Zhang, F. (2021). Meritocracy in Singaporean Educational System: Inequality in Admission to Secondary Schools. Journal of Higher Education
Research, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v2i5.506
Zhang, K. (2024). The Elitist Theory and Its Four Chinese Reverberations: A Discussion Based on China's National Governance Theory.
International Journal of Education and Humanities, 15(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.54097/hb3xf622
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 محمد ناظری صوفی (نویسنده); محسن طاهری; حسین ابوالفضلی (نویسنده)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.