Challenges of Meritocracy in Iranian Management from the Perspective of Governance Development

Authors

    Mohammad Nazeri Sufi PhD Student, Department of Public Law, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
    Mohsen Taheri * Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran. taheri.publiclaw@hotmail.com
    Hosseinali Abolfazli Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/medda.1.1.6

Keywords:

Meritocracy, Good Governance, Managerial Challenges, Structural Reforms, Iran’s Management System

Abstract

Historical experiences indicate that the progress and advancement of any society depend on meritocracy and the appointment of competent individuals and elites in its affairs. Meritocracy, as one of the fundamental principles of governance, plays a crucial role in achieving societal development and excellence. This study aims to analyze the challenges related to the meritocracy of managers in Iran from the perspective of good governance. The research was conducted using a meta-analysis method. In this approach, articles, dissertations, and scientific reports related to the topics of meritocracy and good governance in Iran were collected and analyzed. The challenges of good governance in Iran pertain to obstacles in the implementation of the rule of law, managerial accountability barriers, justice-oriented impediments, and constraints on citizen participation. Some of the meritocracy challenges in Iran include politicization, mismanagement, and an incorrect strategic culture. These obstacles are categorized into two groups: external organizational factors and internal organizational factors. Data analysis revealed that despite the emphasis of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the components of meritocracy and good governance, these concepts have not been practically implemented. This study identifies the challenges related to meritocracy and good governance in Iran and underscores the importance of reforms in the country's managerial and cultural structures. Decision-makers, instead of selecting competent individuals, tend to appoint those who can satisfy all stakeholders and adhere to social and ethnic obligations. This issue reflects the lack of practical realization of meritocracy in Iran’s management system. Ultimately, the study suggests the necessity of serious reforms in the managerial and cultural structures of the country to achieve meritocracy and good governance in the Iranian management system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfianto, R., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., & Asal Wahyuni Erlin Mulyadi Asal Wahyuni Erlin, M. (2023). Non-Meritrocratic Factors Affecting Filling of

Positions in Structural Institutions. Journal of Social Science (Joss), 2(7), 578-586. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v2i7.88

Andersen, D. (2018). Does Meritocracy Lead to Bureaucratic Quality? Revisiting the Experience of Prussia and Imperial and Weimar

Germany. Social Science History, 42(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2017.48

Anwar, R., Luddin, M. R., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Appointment of Leader Position: Study on the Regional Government of West Nusa Tenggara.

Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.11594/10.11594/ijssr.02.02.08

Azadi, P., Mesgaran, M. B., & Mirramezani, M. (2022). Governance. 5-57. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503630468.003.0002

Baroun, A. E. (2021). Meritocracy, Personality Traits and Recruitment: Some Insights From the Qatari Enterprising Community. Journal of

Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(3), 494-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-12-2020-0216

Batruch, A., Jetten, J., Herman, G. v. d. W., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2021). Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and

Income Inequality (In Press). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8rzd9

Bell, D. A. (2016). Three Models of Democratic Meritocracy. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691173047.003.0005

Bing, W. (2021). Political Meritocracy and Policy Integration: How Chinese Government Combats the COVID‐19? Asian Politics & Policy,

13(3), 426-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12595

Choon-Yin, S. (2017). Governance, Meritocracy, and Growth Centricity. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813225831_0001

Chua, C. S. K., Soo, L. M. J., & Raza, K. (2024). Work-Integrated (Adult) Learning: Un-Stigmatizing Blue-Collar Adult Learners in Singapore by

Embracing Visibility. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 30(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241228847

Divina, L. V. (2024). Upholding the Strategy on Hiring Employee Under Meritocracy Procedure Towards a Refined Performance.

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(02), 5821-5830. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.em01

Everest-Philipps, M. (2016). Meritocracy and Public Service Excellence. Review of Civil Servive(1). https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.9

Han, E. J., & Kim, J.-K. (2024). The Relationship Between High School Students’ Meritocracy Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action:

Focusing on the Mediation Effect of System Justification Beliefs and Social Dominance Orientation. Kor MHB Analysis Assoc, 7(1), 51-

72. https://doi.org/10.70316/kmba.2023.7.1.51

Hoyt, C. L., Burnette, J. L., Forsyth, R. B., Parry, M., & DeShields, B. H. (2021). Believing in the American Dream Sustains Negative Attitudes

Toward Those in Poverty. Social psychology quarterly, 84(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725211022319

Jin, J., & Ball, S. J. (2019). Meritocracy, Social Mobility and a New Form of Class Domination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(1),

64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1665496

Kim, S. (2022). Service, Reciprocity, and Remedy: From Confucian Meritocracy to Confucian Democracy. European Journal of Political

Theory, 23(2), 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221127689

Komissarov, A. G. (2022). Meritocratic Principles of Governmental Officials Selection: Historical Aspect and Modern Applications. Voprosy

Ekonomiki(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-45-58

Lee, H. (2023). The Role of Civic Education to Overcome the Limitations of Meritocracy. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum

and Instruction, 23(9), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.9.607

Lee, J. (2024). Four Difficulties in Meritocracy: an Educational Perspective. Korean Educational Research Association, 62(6), 127-155.

https://doi.org/10.30916/kera.62.6.127

Lotfalipour, M. R., Falahi, M. A., Zareei, A., & Matuszczak, A. (2022). How Good Governance (GG) Affects Diaspora Motivations for

Remittances to Iran. Diaspora Studies, 15(4), 329-355. https://doi.org/10.1163/09763457-tat00003

Mang, F. (2020). Political Meritocracy and Its Betrayal. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(9), 1113-1126.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948386

Nabi, G., Shah, N. H., & Ghazanfar, F. (2020). An Analytical Study of Policy, Politics and Bureaucracy Regarding Meritocracy in the Selection

of Head for the Federal Government Institutions. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (Rjsser), 1(4), 401-410.

https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss4-2020(401-410)

Pagano, M., & Picariello, L. (2024). Corporate Governance, Meritocracy, and Careers. Review of Finance.

https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfae042

Sabani, A., Aulia, N., P, N. M., & M, S. N. (2024). Pentingnya Implementasi Sistem Meritokrasi Dalam Instansi Pemerintahan Indonesia.

Aktivisme, 1(3), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v1i3.333

Sudrajat, T., Kunarti, S., & Hartini, S. (2018). Promotion Policy of Civil Servant Based on Meritrocracy Principle in Local Government of

Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.36

Tory, T. F., & Hanum, R. A. (2024). Nepotisme Dan Korupsi Di Pemerintahan Dalam Perspektif Etika. Jmbe-Itb, 3(1), 126-135.

https://doi.org/10.54066/jmbe-itb.v3i1.2726

Zhang, F. (2021). Meritocracy in Singaporean Educational System: Inequality in Admission to Secondary Schools. Journal of Higher Education

Research, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v2i5.506

Zhang, K. (2024). The Elitist Theory and Its Four Chinese Reverberations: A Discussion Based on China's National Governance Theory.

International Journal of Education and Humanities, 15(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.54097/hb3xf622

Downloads

Published

2024-04-18

Submitted

2024-01-06

Revised

2024-02-14

Accepted

2024-04-06

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Nazeri Sufi, M., Taheri, M. ., & Abolfazli, H. (2024). Challenges of Meritocracy in Iranian Management from the Perspective of Governance Development. Management, Education and Development in Digital Age, 1(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.61838/medda.1.1.6

Similar Articles

1-10 of 271

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.