Identification of Key Components of Smart Customer Relationship Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis Approach
Keywords:
exploitation, exploration, Marketing ambidexterity maturity, organizational innovation, telecommunications industryAbstract
The objective of this study was to design and explain a marketing ambidexterity maturity model emphasizing the balance between exploratory and exploitative marketing activities in Iran’s telecommunications industry. This applied study employed a qualitative approach using grounded theory based on the Strauss and Corbin paradigm. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 experts, including telecommunications managers, marketing specialists, technology professionals, and academic scholars. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. Qualitative data were analyzed using MAXQDA software through open, axial, and selective coding procedures. Trustworthiness was ensured using credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability criteria. The final paradigm model clarified relationships among causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening factors, strategies, and outcomes shaping marketing ambidexterity maturity. The findings indicated that marketing ambidexterity maturity emerges through causal conditions including market innovation demands, availability of technological infrastructures, and pressures arising from dynamic technological environments. The phenomenon develops within contextual conditions such as organizational structure, human and cultural resources, and market characteristics, while being moderated by intervening factors including governmental policies, economic resources, leadership style, and industry competition. Strategic responses comprised technological capability development, institutionalization of ambidexterity culture, strategic restructuring, human resource empowerment, and external collaboration. These strategies resulted in improved marketing performance, market expansion, sustainable competitive advantage, and enhanced organizational learning and innovation, ultimately leading to a sustainable balance between exploration and exploitation. The study demonstrates that marketing ambidexterity maturity represents a strategic and cultural transformation in telecommunications organizations whereby institutionalized ambidextrous thinking, data-driven decision-making, and continuous capability development enable firms to simultaneously leverage existing competencies and explore future opportunities, ensuring long-term competitiveness in technology-intensive environments.
Downloads
References
Ardabili, F. S., Verbenko, G., & Cajnko, P. (2025). The effects of organizational agility on organizational performance: the mediating role of ambidexterity. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability Risus, 16(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i2p114-123
Blondiau, A., Mettler, T., & Winter, R. (2016). Designing and implementing maturity models in hospitals: An experience report from 5 years of research. Health Informatics Journal, 22(3), 758-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215590249
Chebbi, H., Yahiaoui, D., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2015). Building multiunit ambidextrous organizations-a transformative framework. Human Resource Management, 54, 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21662
Hakimi, I., & Gholami Avati, R. (2023). Innovation ambidexterity: Antecedents and its effects on new product development. Executive Management Research Journal, 15(29), 45-61. https://jem.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_4301.html?lang=en
Ho, H., Osiyevsky, O., Agarwal, J., & Reza, S. (2020). Does ambidexterity in marketing pay off? The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 110, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.050
Ho, H. D., & Lu, R. (2015). Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.004
Hosseini Fooladi, S., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Ajami, S. (2009). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational maturity of employees in hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2007-2008. Research in Curriculum Planning (Knowledge & Research in Educational Sciences - Curriculum Planning), 6(23-21), 101-116. https://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-107-en.html
Josephson, W., Johnson, L., & Mariadoss, J. (2016). Strategic marketing ambidexterity: Antecedents and financial consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0438-5
Khodami, S., Sadegh Vaziri, F., & Henari, A. (2025). Investigating the effect of ambidextrous factors on international marketing agility. Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, 16(61), 47-70. https://www.smsjournal.ir/article_216100_en.html
Mehrabi, H., Coviello, N., & Ranaweera, C. (2019). Ambidextrous marketing capabilities and performance: How and when entrepreneurial orientation makes a difference. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.014
Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., & Arteaga, F. (2014). Driving organisational ambidexterity through process management. The key role of cultural change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 1026-1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.776768
Nazara, D. S. (2025). Marketing Strategy Innovation: Enhancing Competitiveness and Differentiation of Local Products in the Global Market. Oikonomia: Journal of Management Economics and Accounting, 2(3), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.61942/oikonomia.v2i3.358
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Santos-Neto, J. B. S., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2019). Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(5), 719-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1575986
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Srikanth, K., & Ungureanu, T. (2025). Organizational adaptation in dynamic environments: Disentangling the effects of how much to explore versus where to explore. Strategic management journal, 46(1), 19-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3646
Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 فروزان شریفی فر (نویسنده); منوچهر نیکنام; مهدی زکی پور (نویسنده)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.